Renewable energy in Finland of electricity was (2005): Water 60%, forest industry black liquor 22%, other wood residues 16%, wind power 0.2% and other RE 1 %. The European objectives are: 22% renewable source electricity and 12% renewable of primary energy in 2010 (directive and white paper). This includes e.g. the objectives of 40 GW wind power, 3 GW PV and 5.75 % biofuels (2010). The wind power objective was reached in 2005. The leading wind power countries have set new, more ambitious goals.
Olkiluoto 3 nuclear plant represents 85% of Finland's planned investments in new power generation between 2006-2010. Investments in new renewables, including wind and solar heating, is negligible.[1] Renewable energy targets (wind, solar, biogas, biofuel) have not been taken seriously or binding in the energy politics development program as Finland will not fulfill even its modest national renewable energy targets for the year 2010.
Contents |
Finland's energy consumption increased 44% in electricity and 30% in total energy use during the period 1990-2006. The increase in electricity consumption of 15,000 GWh (1995–2005) was more than Finland's total hydroelectric power capacity. The consumption increased almost equally in all sectors (industry, residential, and services). The share of renewable electricity in Finland has been stable (1998–2005): 11-12% plus yearly variable hydroelectric power, totaling 24-27%. The forest industries contributed 57 % of the RE power generation via black liquor and wood burning in 1990. By 2005 this share had grown to 67%.[2] The rest consisting primarily of hydroelectric power. As with most first world countries, the vast majority of commercially viable hydroelectric sites in Finland have already been developed. The forest industry uses 30% of all electricity in Finland (1990–2005). Its process wastes, wood residues, and black liquor were used to produce 7-8000 GWh of electricity in 2005. However, during that year electricity consumption fell 10 % compared to 2004 as a result of a prolonged forest industry labour dispute.[3] Finland's power consumption was (2005) 17.3 MW electricity per capita compared to Germany 7.5 MW per capita. This number includes the power losses of the distribution.
The objective of RE (2005) of electricity was 35% (1997–2010). However, (2006) the Finnish objective was dropped to 31.5% (1997–2010). According to ‘Renewables Global Status Report’ Finland aims to increase RE only 2 % in 13 years. This objective to add the RE use with 2% in 13 years is among the most modest of all the EU countries.[4]
Finnish CO2 emissions grew 14.5% (1990:2004), while the EU average was - 0.6%.[5] According to the Finnish RE organizations and Finnish public the potential of RE increase in Finland is huge. Owing to its exceptionally low population density and abundance of natural resources.
Finland does not use feed-in tariffs, fixed premiums, green certificate systems or tendering procedures. From the European countries, Finland, Malta and Slovenia are the only ones (2006) that use only tax incentives to promote wind energy and other renewable electricity. Finland has no obligations or binding recommendations for the power companies to promote RE.[6]
Wind power in Finland[7] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Year | MW | GWh | ||
1990 | 0 | 0 | ||
1991 | 1 | 1 | ||
1992 | 1 | 2 | ||
1993 | 5 | 4 | ||
1994 | 5 | 5 | ||
1995 | 6 | 11 | ||
1996 | 7 | 11 | ||
1997 | 12 | 17 | ||
1998 | 17 | 24 | ||
1999 | 38 | 49 | ||
2000 | 38 | 77 | ||
2001 | 39 | 70 | ||
2002 | 43 | 63 | ||
2003 | 52 | 92 | ||
2004 | 82 | 120 | ||
2005 | 82 | 168 | ||
2006 | 86 | 153 | ||
2007 | 109 | 188 | ||
2008 | 142 | 261 | ||
2009 | 147 | 277 | ||
2010 | 197 |
EWEA has predicted that wind power will cover 13-16 % of EU electricity consumption with 180 GW capacity (2020).[8] Europe's total installed capacity is 48 042 MW (2006).
In Finland the capacity of wind power is (2006) 86 MW. This is 0.2 % of electricity consumption. The objective is 494 MW (1995–2010). In 11 years Finland has installed 17 % of its objective. Wind power could produce at least 20–30 % of Finland's energy demand. The capacity 3 500 MW (8 TWh) corresponds 10 % of electricity consumption in Finland. Implementation has slowed down by inefficient support systems.[9] The lack of confidence in the stability of electricity and subsidies has prevented the small power companies to build wind power. According to a public opinion survey in the Pori district 97 % of the area consumers supported addition of wind power (2000). According to the Finnish Ministry of Trade and Industry the goal of 500 MW of wind power (2010) is not possible in Finland, as it would demand intensive tax reductions that are prohibited by the European Union legislation.[10]
Finland uses a lot of wood as energy based on the forest industry. Its volume has increased in the industrial use. As the energy consumption has increased, the share of RE is constant. However, simultaneously the use of non-renewable energy has grown about 20 %. In comparison, in Germany the non-RE source of electricity grew only 2 % (1990–2005).
Finland uses insignificant wood pellet quantities for thermal energy production. In Sweden and Denmark active energy politics with significant taxation of fossil energy has encouraged an early development of the pellet market. This development has taken place much faster than in Finland where economic incentives are missing, and competing sources of energy are cheap.
Pellets in Finland | ||
---|---|---|
Year | GWh | tonnes |
2001 | 71 | 15 000 |
2002 | 114 | 24 000 |
2003 | 183 | 39 000 |
2004 | 221 | 47 000 |
2005 | 257 | 55 000 |
2006 | 411 | 87 000 |
2007 | ? | 100 000 |
Pellet production was 192 000 tons (2005). Pellet consumption was 55 000 t (2005), 47 000 t (2004), 39 000 t (2003), 24 000 t (2002) ja 15 000 t (2001). The pellets are mainly exported. Finland has no binding objectives for pellet use promotion.[2]
The Swedish consumption 1 400 000 ton pellets = 6500 GWh, would equal half of Finland's water power. In Sweden, the continuous government support ensures stable market conditions, energy taxes are established many years ago and there are promotion programs for the implementation of pellet heating. In Sweden 40 % of pellets are used in central heating (2006). The small house market potential is estimated to be 1.5-2 million tons of pellet fuel. Thus, there are potentials to double the present pellet use in Sweden. The existing heating boilers can be converted to pellet heating.[13][14]
The PV capacity of Finland was (2006) 4.1 MWp. Solar power in Finland was (1993–1999) 1 GWh, (2000–2004) 2 GWh and (2005) 3 GWh.[15] There has been at least one demonstration project by the YIT Rakennus, NAPS Systems, Lumon and City of Helsinki in 2003. Finland is not a member either in the IEA's Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme or the Scandinavian Photovoltaic Industry Association, SPIA.
The objective in solar heating is 163 000 m2 collector area (1995–2010).[16] In 2006 the collector area in operation was 16 493 m2.[17] Solar heat in Finland was (1997–2004) 4-5 GWh and (2005) 6 GWh.[15] Thus, Finland has installed 10 % of its objective in 11 years time (1995–2010). The solar heating has not been competitive due to cheap alternatives (electricity, fuel oil and district heating) and the lack of support systems. Companies and public organizations may receive 40% investment subsidies, but private houses do not receive subsidies yet. The Finnish Solar Industries (FSI) group was established in 2001.[16] 2006/2005 the markets grew 43 %. Finland's production capacity is 16 000 m²/a. New installations were: 2 380 m2 (2006), 1 668 m2 (2005) and 1 141 m2 (2004). There are growth opportunities in the solar heating.
Use of Biofuels in Finland [15] | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | Bioaethanol | Biogas | Biodiesel |
1995 | 0 | 180 | 0 |
1996 | 0 | 190 | 0 |
1997 | 0 | 197 | 0 |
1998 | 0 | 217 | 0 |
1999 | 0 | 212 | 0 |
2000 | 0 | 238 | 0 |
2001 | 0 | 209 | 0 |
2002 | 9 | 244 | 0 |
2003 | 49 | 269 | 0 |
2004 | 52 | 308 | 0 |
2005 | 0 | 486 | 0 |
The European Union has the objective of 5.75 % of biofuels (2010). The biofuels report do not include the Finnish objective.[18] They are not published yet. The Finnish Ministry of Trade and Industry report (KTM 11/2006) admits that Finland would be able to fulfill the 5.75 % objective. The ministry report does not recommend it, because of its expenses. The production price of biofuels in Finland would be equal to other EU countries, 3 cents pro liter.[19]
The Finnish parliament did not consider bioethanol competitive in Finland. The director of Altia resigned as Altia's major bioethanol project failed; increased costs made it unprofitable. However, the biodiesel production is investigated in a publicly funded research program. Partly state owned power company, Fortum, has informed that it will start the biodiesel production. Fortum is one of the major oil, nuclear power and water power producers. It received the water power in an M&A agreement years ago. Fortum is also a partner in the most wind power projects and the owner of the NAPS Solar Energy (or NAPS Systems).
The public transportation in the Helsinki metropolitan area has decided to use the palm oil biodiesel of Neste Oil. In 2010 half of the busses will use it. Finnish government is supporting financially the biodiesel use.[20] Neste Oil biodiesel will be tax free for the public transportation until 2010. This is worth 7.2 million euros for Neste Oil and may diminish the share of other competing biofuels.[21]
National car taxation was reduced in 2003. This reduced the public transportation ca 8 % and increased the annual sell of new cars 25 % from 120 000 to 150 000. In 2007 the government decided to further reduce the price of 80 % of cars. The average car tax is reduced from 26 % to 22 %. The new taxation 1.1.2008 will take the CO2 emissions into account. The petrol price is slightly increased. However, this tax reform is predicted to increase the number of two- and three-car-households and decrease the use of public transportation.[22] The new metro line was considered as more urgent by 58 % of citizens than the new ring road (38 %). This Gallup research about the new traffic projects in Helsinki, Vantaa and Espoo was made in 7/2007. It did not study the support of alternatives.[23] Before 1.1.2004, there were practically no private CNG driven cars. Only at this point the legislation was changed so that only CNG driven Euro-4 OEM cars are not subject to heavy taxation and the number of such cars has been increasing slowly. LPG and E85 driven cars are still subject to heavy taxes and fines making it de facto not possible to use such or any other alternative fuel cars except electric cars in Finland.
The student and pensioner discount is 50 % in the public transport in the Helsinki metropolitan area in 2007. As one alternative YTV suggests to drop the discount to 30 % and to limit it to students under 25-years and pensioners over 70-years.[24] Public transport in the Helsinki metropolitan area is the most important in Finland. Public transport in the Helsinki metropolitan area includes (zone 1): Helsinki, (zone2): Espoo + Kauniainen + Vantaa and (zone 3): Kerava + Kirkkonummi. As the cities form a single metropolitan area, a 2-zone-travel may take less than 10 minutes. Fares for a single area tickets are 2007 :
There are no restrictions or pay duties for cars in the Helsinki metropolitan area in 2007. The new underground parking lots and road passages have been actively promoted by the Helsinki town leder Jussi Pajunen and Espoo town administration during 2006-2007. Jussi Pajunen wants to promote the use of private cars in the Helsinki city center.[25] This statement aroused criticism. Thereafter he gave some less car intensive statements.
Finnish politicians and industry actively promote the fuel production from peat. According to European Union and IPCC peat is not biofuel as claimed but have equal CO2 emissions to coal.[26] The EU also promotes the protection of swamps from ecological disasters. The Finnish peat company Vapo Oy is owned by the state (50.1 %) and the forest industry company Metsäliitto (49.9 %)(including Metsä-Botnia, M-real and Metsä Tissue and previously also Finnforest). They want to use the peat as fuel and dry the swamps as forests. [27] Scandinavian peat was formed 10 000 years ago after the ice age. 1.1.2005 the European common carbon dioxide emission system was agreed, and according to the agreement peat is equal to fossil fuel.[28]
Renewable electricity consumption (GWh)[29][30][31] | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Electricity | Non-RE | Non-RE growth % |
RE | RE % | RE without water% |
Water | Wind | Black L | Wood | Other RE |
1990 | 62,334 | 45,882 | 0.0 | 16,452 | 26.4 | 9.1 | 10,752 | 0 | |||
1991 | 62,288 | 43,371 | -5.5 | 18,917 | 30.4 | 9.4 | 13,066 | 1 | |||
1992 | 63,196 | 42,467 | -7.4 | 20,729 | 32.8 | 9.1 | 14,957 | 2 | |||
1993 | 65,545 | 45,372 | -1.1 | 20,173 | 30.8 | 10.4 | 13,343 | 4 | |||
1994 | 68,257 | 49,238 | 7.3 | 19,019 | 27.9 | 10.8 | 11,663 | 7 | |||
1995 | 68,946 | 50,068 | 9.1 | 18,878 | 27.4 | 8.8 | 12,788 | 11 | |||
1996 | 70,018 | 51,915 | 13.1 | 18,103 | 25.9 | 9.1 | 11,704 | 11 | |||
1997 | 73,603 | 54,334 | 18.4 | 19,269 | 26.2 | 10.2 | 11,795 | 17 | |||
1998 | 76,630 | 53,585 | 16.8 | 23,045 | 30.1 | 10.8 | 14,777 | 23 | |||
1999 | 77,779 | 56,398 | 22.9 | 21,381 | 27.5 | 11.4 | 12,547 | 49 | |||
2000 | 79,158 | 56,482 | 23.1 | 22,676 | 28.6 | 10.4 | 14,453 | 77 | 5,126 | 2,920 | 101 |
2001 | 81,188 | 60,301 | 31.4 | 20,887 | 25.7 | 9.7 | 13,018 | 70 | 4,765 | 2,886 | 149 |
2002 | 83 542 | 64 377 | 40.3 | 19,165 | 22.9 | 10.2 | 10,623 | 63 | 5,140 | 3,194 | 144 |
2003 | 85,229 | 66,871 | 44.7 | 18,358 | 21.5 | 10.4 | 9,455 | 92 | 5,255 | 3,389 | 189 |
2004 | 87,041 | 62,239 | 35.7 | 24,802 | 28.5 | 11.4 | 14,865 | 120 | 5,779 | 3,827 | 210 |
2005** | 84,672 | 62,086 | 35.3 | 22,586 | 26.7 | 10.8 | 13,430 | 172 | 5,060 | 3,649 | 281 |
2006 | 90,024 | 68,355 | 49.0 | 21 670 | 24.1 | 11.5 | 11 313 | 153 | 5,900 | 4,073 | 231 |
2007 | 90,374 | 66,779 | 45.5 | 23,595 | 26.1 | 10.6 | 13,991 | 188 | 5,719 | 3,419 | 274 |
2008 | 87,247 | 60,277 | 31.4 | 26,970 | 30.9 | 11.5 | 16,909 | 261 | 5,250 | 4,346 | 280 |
2009* | 80,795 | 59,895 | 30.5 % | 20,900 | 25.9 % | 10.3 % | 12,564 | 276 | 8,100*** | ||
* = preliminary information, ** = decline based on the forest industry strike, RE = Renewable energy, Black L=Black liquor ***=no detailed info |
The renewable energy of primary energy was 24.0 % (2005) and 24.1 % (2004). Total primary energy supply was 392 022 (2005) and 418 672 GWh (2004). The primary energy includes in addition to the energy consumption also e.g. the heating up of the Baltic Sea by the nuclear power plant waste heat.
Renewable energy of energy consumption GWh[29][32][33] | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Energy | Non-RE growth % |
RE | RE % | Wood | Water | Wind | Other* | ||
1990 | 317,321 | 0 % | 57,895 | 18.2 | 46,450 | 10,752 | 0 | 693 | ||
1991 | 312,743 | -1.8 % | 57,889 | 18.5 | 44,064 | 13,066 | 1 | 758 | ||
1992 | 309,616 | -4.0 % | 60,491 | 19.5 | 44,768 | 14,957 | 2 | 764 | ||
1993 | 319,025 | -1.8 % | 64,275 | 20.1 | 50,132 | 13,339 | 4 | 800 | ||
1994 | 340,946 | 5.0 % | 68,515 | 20.1 | 56,044 | 11,662 | 7 | 802 | ||
1995 | 334,853 | 1.6 % | 71,397 | 21.3 | 57,650 | 12,788 | 11 | 948 | ||
1996 | 349,424 | 7.0 % | 71,847 | 20.6 | 59,107 | 11,704 | 11 | 1,025 | ||
1997 | 359,309 | 8.1 % | 78,790 | 21.9 | 65,877 | 11,795 | 17 | 1,101 | ||
1998 | 364,033 | 7.6 % | 84,941 | 23.3 | 68,788 | 14,777 | 23 | 1,353 | ||
1999 | 372,798 | 9.0 % | 89,947 | 24.1 | 75 781 | 12,547 | 49 | 1,570 | ||
2000 | 367,600 | 6.8 % | 90,636 | 24.7 | 74,364 | 14,453 | 77 | 1,742 | ||
2001 | 380,769 | 12.9 % | 87,762 | 23.0 | 72,573 | 13,018 | 70 | 2,101 | ||
2002 | 392,116 | 16.0 % | 91,209 | 23.3 | 78,275 | 10,623 | 63 | 2,248 | ||
2003 | 413,478 | 23.8 % | 92,200 | 22.3 | 79,903 | 9,455 | 92 | 2,750 | ||
2004 | 412,040 | 19.5 % | 102,113 | 24.8 | 83,961 | 14,865 | 120 | 3,167 | ||
2005** | 381,568 | 10.3 % | 95,434 | 25.0 | 78,036 | 13,428 | 168 | 3,802 | ||
2006 | 417,021 | 21.0 % | 103,213 | 24.8 | 87,534 | 11,313 | 153 | 4,212 | ||
2007 | 410,273 | 18.4 % | 103,063 | 25.1 | 83,929 | 13,991 | 188 | 4,936 | ||
2008 | 392,776 | 9.4 % | 109,015 | 27.8 | 83,929 | 16,909 | 261 | 7,916 | ||
2009* | 369,837 | 5.9 % | 95,116 | 25.7 | 72,722 | 12,564 | 276 | 9,554 | ||
RE = Renewable Energy, Non-RE = Non-renewable energy + import, Wood = Black liquor, industry and small scale wood fuels, * = Preliminary information 2009, ** = decline based on long forest industry strike in 2005 Other RE 2006 (GWh): Heat pumps – electricity 2,397, Recycled fuel 1,062, Biogas 424, Other Bioenergy 252, Biofuel 10, Solar power 11 |
In the table is the contribution of RE to electricity production for the EU-25 by 2020.
|